Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

BU Hockey Star Charged With Sexual Assault in Boston

December 15, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

A former Boston University hockey star and New York Islanders draft pick was recently charged with a sex crime in Boston.

This comes just weeks after our Boston criminal defense lawyer reported about New England Patriots wide receiver and special teams member Julian Edelman being charged with a sex crime in Boston as well.

Facing sex charges in Massachusetts can be a life-altering experience. It can lead, in the short term, to job loss, loss of reputation, time in jail, the cost of posting bail, family problems and other sanctions. In the long term, it can open up a person to prison time, probation, registration as a sex offender and other serious consequences and criminal penalties.

Corey Trivino, a 21-year-old native Canadian, was recently kicked off the Islanders after news surfaced of his arrest. He pleaded not guilty to two counts of breaking and entering in the nighttime and to a charge of assault with attempt to rape in Brighton District Court.

The hockey forward is charged with following a young woman to her room and forcing his way into the room, Fox News reports. According to police reports, when the girl told him to leave, he began kissing and groping her. He allegedly left and came back two more times. The last time, he demanded to spend the night and she called for help, forcing him to leave.

Boston University police later arrested him in the dorm’s elevator and he said he lived with the girl. Police say he appeared intoxicated.

He was permanently removed from the hockey team’s roster and was ordered to stay away from campus housing. The news article reports he surrendered his Canadian passport and is scheduled to appear back in court in January.

As with the Edelman case, this situation may come down to whether the “victim” is, in fact, a “victim.” With athletes and celebrities, admirers may often involve themselves and then make unfair allegations.

In Trivino’s case, he came to the woman’s dorm room several times and she never felt threatened. Only after a third time of him coming over to her room did she call police. If there are no witnesses or roommates who heard shouting or some type of argument, it was probably safe to say she didn’t really mind his company.

Not until the third time did she call for help and police made a determination that the alleged crimes had occurred. Obviously, hockey at BU is the biggest sport on campus, and their players are widely known. This can make for great fanfare for the student-athletes, but it can also lead to victimization because of their celebrity.

For the everyday person, a sex crime can be as devastating or worse. A job loss today is a major financial hit and without the means to get re-hired, it can be devastating. Not only that, but facing prison time and registry as a sex offender for a term of years can make anyone realize that fighting a sex crime is critical.
Continue Reading ›

Mom Charged With Rehoboth First Offense OUI After Vodka, Toddler Found in Car

December 13, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

A first offense Massachusetts OUI charge and child endangerment charge was brought after a mother from Somerset was allegedly found drunk in her car with her child, The Herald News reports.

Being charged with OUI in Rehoboth is a serious, and potentially life-changing, event. Having additional charges levied by police and prosecutors can make a bad situation worse.

But it doesn’t mean you are powerless. Hiring an experienced Massachusetts OUI lawyer can have a positive impact on the outcome of your case.

In some cases, evidence seized by police can be tossed out of an OUI case if procedures weren’t followed. And individual pieces of evidence, such as breath test results and field sobriety testing, may be inadmissible in some cases. A lawyer is the best way to address those facts and whether or not they belong in an OUI case.

Rehoboth police allegedly found the woman inside an unlocked vehicle in a parking lot. Police said her 3-year-old son was inside the vehicle as well.

According to a police report, the woman was passed out with blood on her face and hands, the newspaper is reporting. The car had minor front-end damage, police said, opining that the vehicle may have hit a tree or stump. The vehicle was found in a parking lot at the edge of Middlebrook Country Club’s parking lot on Pleasant Street.

When police awoke the woman, she allegedly displayed signs of intoxication. Officers spotted a bottle of vodka in the car’s front seat. Officers said it was half-empty. The woman was taken to the hospital and treated and the boy’s father was called to pick him up.

After being arraigned, Roberts was released on $2,500 cash bail and is scheduled to appear back in court in mid-December.

A child endangerment conviction can lead to a driver’s license loss for one year. In some cases, that charge and other related charges can be dropped if the defendant agrees to enter a plea to the OUI charge. But that may not be the best plan of action and taking the prosecutor’s first plea offer may not serve the defendant well, either.

In Massachusetts, in order to be found guilty of OUI, the prosecution must prove the three elements of the crime — that the defendant operated the vehicle, that the defendant did so in a public place and that while operating the person was under the influence or their blood-alcohol level was above 0.08.

Proving that a person was “operating” a vehicle can be difficult sometimes, if the person isn’t pulled over by police while driving. But the state has made it easier for the state to prove because even people whose cars are parked can be considered to be operating the vehicle.
Continue Reading ›

Marlborough Man Charged With Massachusets Domestic Assault and Battery

December 10, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

A Marlborough man is being held in connection with an alleged domestic violence incident involving his girlfriend, reports The MetroWest Daily News.

Charges of assault and battery in Westborough are typically filed by authorities in cases where there is some type of fight or domestic dispute. The severity of injuries sustained by the alleged victim goes a long way toward prosecutors determining what type of charge to bring.

This is a commonly filed charge in domestic assault and battery incidents in Massachusetts. And these charges, while somewhat common, can be some of the most difficult cases to bring for prosecutors. Massachusetts criminal defense lawyers have seen that many times, the charges come down to one person’s word against another’s, which can be tough for jurors to determine.

When police are called to a person’s house after an alleged victim calls 911 to report a domestic incident, they have to make a snap judgement, based often on which person seems most credible, who is bigger and who has more scratches or bruises. This is a difficult task and many times, police take the stereotypical way out and choose the man as the suspect and the woman as victim.

Jason Cavooto, 36, is charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, assault and battery and threatening to commit a crime, the newspaper reports. He is already facing charges of running a methamphetamine lab out of his shed and carrying a gun without a license. The case is being heard in Middlesex Superior Court.

In this case, a Marlborough District Court judge ordered him held without bail after it was discovered he had the open case in Middlesex Superior Court. Bail was initially $10,000.

According to the newspaper’s account Cavooto’s girlfriend told police that they were sitting with a friend at their house when she said something to him. He cussed at her and punched her in the arms and stomach, which caused her to throw up, she said. He allegedly backhanded her, which knocked her out.

Later that night, according to police, he punched her in the mouth and split her lip. He is accused of throwing her into the kitchen table, cutting her back and breaking a mirror. He also allegedly grabbed her by the throat and choked her the next morning. When he called the next day, he allegedly threatened her and while the phone was still connected, told a friend he was going to kill her.

In Massachusetts, in order to find a person guilty of assault and battery, the state has to prove three specific elements:

That the defendant touched the person without having the right to do so
That the defendant intended to touch the person
That the touching either was likely to cause bodily harm or was done without consent

More Women Being Arrested for Drunk Driving in Massachusetts

December 9, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

The Washington Post is reporting that more woman are being arrested for drunk driving.

Yet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported this fall that men were responsible for 81 percent of drinking and driving incidents in 2010.

Some of these statistics can be unreliable. For instance, law enforcement runs public relations and media campaigns trying to get people to think that OUI in Massachusetts and nationwide is on the rise.

But, studies have shown that the number of OUI incidents in Fall River, Framingham, Boston and elsewhere are actually on the decline. So, what do you believe?

Our Westborough OUI lawyers recognize that law enforcement will believe the statistics that justify their DUI road blocks and saturation patrols — DUI is a moneymaker and they are looking to make as many OUI arrests as possible. Whether numbers are up or not, police will be out in full force.

The CDC reports that adults drank and drove 112 million times in 2010 according to the agency’s survey. Men ages 21 to 34 made up 32 percent of all drunken driving episodes, but make up only 11 percent of the population. Eighty-five percent of drinking and driving involved binge drinking — 5 or more drinks for men or 4 or more drinks for women in a short period.

A study by The Century Council, as reported by The Washington Post, suggests that mothers have been drinking and driving with their children more often lately. A study found that the average female drunk driver is older and more educated than their male counterparts.

The profile of a typical female drunken driver didn’t surprise researchers, who put together the study after the 2009 accident of a mother in New York who was under the influence of drugs and alcohol and caused a wrong-way crash that killed her, her daughter, three nieces and three men in another vehicle.

The article suggests that some parents, especially mothers, may have a glass of wine or two with friends while caring for their children. This may be a more common situation than we might realize.

But like any OUI case, the charges must be proven. Even a person arrested can’t be considered guilty until it is proven in court, despite the court of public opinion. That’s what trials are for. And women may face additional charges, most commonly child endangerment, which can increase the potential penalties for a conviction.

The Commonwealth has a great burden in proving someone committed a crime and simply going on the word of the officer who pulled the vehicle over is not enough. More must be proven.

If field sobriety tests were conducted, they must have been conducted appropriately, with consideration taken for weather conditions and possibly the person’s physical ailments, could have affected the outcome. If there were witnesses and dash cam surveillance, that, too, should be a factor.

If a driver consents to a breath test machine sample, the reading should be challenged. These machines have been known to be faulty, as thousands of cases have been dismissed because the machines either weren’t properly calibrated or maintained or they weren’t manufactured correctly.

All of these are factors in a Massachusetts OUI case. Whether you’re a woman or a man, it’s no matter. An experienced Massachusetts OUI lawyer can help.
Continue Reading ›

Women Accused of Counterfeiting Scheme in Plainville, Massachusetts

December 7, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

Two women from New York have been charged in a case of trying to use counterfeit bills to make purchases at Target stores in Plainville, North Attleboro, Seekonk and Connecticut.

Counterfeiting schemes could be considered larceny in Attleboro — a form of theft. In most cases, suspects use fake bills in order to make purchases. Many times, these cases can be difficult for police to discover unless the cashier checks the bills on the spot. However, counterfeiting can also be a federal crime investigated by the U.S. Secret Service.

Trying to piece together video footage and witness testimony after the fact and link a person to the crime can be a tricky proposition for the police. While the technology behind the government’s printing of dollars has gotten better in recent years, there are still people willing to try to literally print money.

For those who are arrested, an experienced Massachusetts defense attorney must be hired in order to investigate all the facts and look at the evidence police intend to use against the defendant. It may be possible, in some cases, for the evidence filed by police to be suppressed if rights were violated in the process. That happens only depending on the specific circumstances of the case, however.

In this case, The Sun-Chronicle reports, two woman were allegedly conducting a scheme where they would use counterfeit money to buy electronics at stores and then attempt to exchange them at other stores for the cash.

“They were doing some type of flim-flam, buying I-pods and I-pads at Target, using counterfeit money to buy them, and returning them to other Targets to get real money,” said Plainville Police Sgt. Scott Gallerani.

According to the newspaper’s report, several thousand dollars in counterfeit money were confiscated by officers. 24-year-old Iyanah Wright of Hempstead, New York, and 22-year-old Shannon Hoskins of Freeport, New York, have been arrested.

The newspaper reports that Wright was arrested after a foot pursuit in the parking lot of a Target store in Plainville. Hoskins was found by store security and held there. Both women now face charges of possession of counterfeit notes, receiving stolen property and conspiracy. Wright also faces a charge of resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

According to police, detectives in Seekonk and North Attleboro are now investigating to see whether the women may be connected to alleged incidents there. Connecticut authorities may be, too. The women reportedly have open cases in New York of a similar situation.

There may also be a man who is involved as a “lookout” in connection with the incident. The women were set for an arraignment in Wrentham District Court.

Proving that the women knew the money to be counterfeited may be a challenge for police. The fact that they may have committed the crime in different areas has no bearing on these individual cases. If they are charged with committing the crime in Connecticut, an Attleboro jury likely won’t know that. They must determine guilt based on the incident that allegedly happened in that area. That may be tough in this case.
Continue Reading ›

Taunton Brothers Face Massachusetts Drugs Charges After Police Raid

November 21, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

The Taunton Daily Gazette reports that two brothers are facing guns and drug charges after a police raid.

Drug charges and gun charges in Taunton often go hand-in-hand.

Massachusetts criminal defense lawyers have defended many clients charged with both crimes. In the Commonwealth, drug charges can range from possession of a small amount of marijuana to being caught with larger amounts that can lead to trafficking charges.

In gun cases, possession of a gun without a firearm identification card can lead to mandatory jail time. Possession by a convicted felon or using a weapon while committing another crime are also serious offenses.

But there are many defenses to these two charges. Your defense lawyer must carefully review the facts and circumstances that led police to believe they were justified in filing such charges. If they relied on a search warrant to gain entry to a home, car or business to seek evidence, what was written in an affidavit must be scrutinized.

In many cases, a group of people can be riding in a car that gets pulled over by law enforcement. If there’s an illegal gun or drugs in the car, police will sometimes attempt to charge everyone. That’s simply not right and cases like that have been overturned and charged dropped because police don’t have the facts to back up such charges.

In this case, 19-year-old Adilson DaGraca-Teixeira and 21-year-old Jason DaGraca-Teixeira are charged with possession of heroin with intent to distribute, conspiracy to violate drug laws, possession of ammunition without a firearms identification card and possession of a firearm without a firearms identification card. They are both being held without bond while they await a February 2 trial date.

On November 3, police raided their apartment at 56 Wales St. after they got a search warrant signed by a judge. Officers said they found heroine, oxycodone as well as a hidden compartment in the ceiling that contained ammunition and two handguns. The defendants’ sister, Melinda Teixeira, 18, was arrested as well as three other people. She is being charged with possession of heroin with intent to distribute, being present where heroin is kept and conspiracy to violate drug laws.

Three other 19-year-olds — Alexander Torres Jr., of Brockton, Jeschalie Jimenez, of Providence and Darius Jones of Taunton face various drug possession charges.

These young people now face very serious drug charges that can have a profound effect on their future. But remember, it is the prosecution’s job to prove the charges, not the other way around. A defendant doesn’t have to say anything before a jury because the charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, not disproven.

There are defenses that must be considered for a person facing charges that are this serious. When the defendants are young and have a future ahead of them, the responsibility is even greater. Putting your faith in an experienced and aggressive Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer is the best course of action at the earliest possible stage in such cases.
Continue Reading ›

United States Supreme Court hears argument addressing whether GPS tracking violates the Fourth Amendment

November 17, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

The United States Supreme Court heard arguments in a case raising the issue of whether GPS monitoring violates an individuals Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Constitution. The case is United States v. Antoine Jones, and the filings from the case can be found on the Scotus Blog.

The criminal defense lawyers in the case allege that Jones’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when federal agents put a GPS tracking device on his car without his consent. The tracking resulted in the defendant being charged with federal drug charges. To read an excellent commentary on the case click here to read Shannon Bream’s Article for Fox News.

The case addressed the issue of whether a warrant must be obtained under the Fourth Amendment before the State can monitor someone through GPS surveillance. In the case, the police obtained a warrant to monitor the activity of defendant Jones; however, the warrant expired, meaning that no valid search warrant authorized the GPS monitoring. The federal agents in the case installed a GPS tracking device on the defendant’s car without his knowledge or consent.

Brawl in Taunton Broken Up By Off-Duty Police Officer results in Massachusetts Assault and Battery charges

November 15, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

An off-duty Mansfield police officer was credited with breaking up a daylight brawl between three men who had tire irons and a knife, the Taunton Daily Gazette is reporting.

Self-defense is one of the most commonly acknowledged theories of defense portrayed on television criminal shows and in novels. But in assault and battery charges in Attleboro, can also be a legitimate defense. In this case, the presence of weapons will complicate the defense and will likely enhance the charges faced by the defendants.

If someone is attacked, either with fists or weapons, they have a right to defend themselves. If you are arrested, the skills of an experienced Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer can aid in explaining this to a jury. Too often, police just make an arrest, regardless of who is right or wrong at the scene.

When violent acts take place, police can sometimes have a tough time sorting out the pieces. If the victim and suspect are both pointing fingers at each other, it can be independent witnesses, video surveillance or even physical evidence that can point to the truth. A skilled lawyer can get to the bottom of the case.

In this case, according to the newspaper, Michael Dutra, 56, and John Carveiro, 48, allegedly told police they thought Reginald Jenkins, 44, had stolen $50 they accidentally dropped outside a package store. When they realized the money was missing, they remembered seeing Jenkins reach down in the parking lot and pick something up, the police report states.

They drove around hoping to spot Jenkins and they found him walking in a nearby parking lot a few blocks away. They allegedly both got tire irons from their pickup truck and began swinging at Jenkins. He also got a tire iron from the pickup truck and tried to defend himself, but was hit in the head and arm. He was also stabbed in his back by someone carrying a knife.

Police say that an off-duty police officer from Mansifled, Jeffrey Danner, was driving nearby and saw the brawl as it took place. Once Jenkins hit the ground, Danner pulled up, exited his vehicle, pulled out his badge and a handgun and ordered them to stay put.

Carveiro was charged with two counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, two counts of carrying a dangerous weapon and one count of disorderly conduct.

Jenkins is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, disturbing the peace and disorderly conduct. The newspaper didn’t have details of the charges Dutra faces.

In this case, according to the newspaper and police reports, it appears clear that Jenkins was the victim and yet he faces charges. Had the other two men not allegedly stopped to start the fight, he wouldn’t have been involved. And after they grabbed weapons, he would have been foolish to stand by and allow them to beat him.

One can only hope that Jenkins gets an experienced and dedicated Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer to straighten things out with the prosecution in order to avoid any long-term consequences as a result of these charges.
Continue Reading ›

Legislation requiring prosecutors to consent to a bench trial in response to the Boston Globe special OUI report would be unconstitutional

November 13, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

In response to the Boston Globe Special Report on OUI bench trials in Massachusetts, the Globe reported that prosecutors are seeking legislation requiring prosecutors to consent to a bench trial. Assuming this report is accurate, this legislation would have to apply to every type of criminal case as legislation relating to criminal procedure cannot be crime specific. This legislation if proposed would be an unconstitutional violation of a defendant’s right to a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment.

The apparent aim of the legislation is to combat the perceived high rate of not guilty verdicts in Massachusetts OUI bench trials. This legislation would clearly be unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment provides that a defendant in a criminal case enjoys certain rights: These rights include the right to a speedy trial and the defendant enjoys a right to a trial by jury. The use of the word “enjoys” in the Constitution provides strong textual support for the argument that a defendant can waive this right.

The right to a trial by jury was added to the Bill of Rights because the Framers of the Constitution feared that judges would not be impartial to defendants because their salary depended on the rule of the King. The original intent of the jury trial was to limit the power of Government and ensure that citizens judged citizens. The right to a jury trial is not Constitutionally required in all cases; in minor offense, with no possibility of jail time, there is no Constitutional right to a jury trial.

Comments on part II of Boston Globe’s special report on OUI bench trials

November 6, 2011 | by Michael DelSignore

The Boston Globe published its second of three installments on drunk driving bench trials in Massachusetts. The Globe claimed to have researched the number of not guilty verdicts from selected judges that were targeted by prosecutors and published statistics of their rate of not guilty verdicts. Click here to read Part II of the Globe’s special report. This special report focused primarily on Plymouth County OUI cases but also targeted many of the same judges criticized in the first part of its report. To read my Blog regarding Part I of the special report, you can click here.

The Globe’s article is clearly motivated to further the political agenda of prosecutors. An example of this is that the Globe was critical of one Taunton District Court judge who finds that the lack of video tape evidence can be used against the Commonwealth when determining whether the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is satisfied. Instead, the Globe purports to adopt the reasoning of the State police that video is not used because it does not show the subtle signs of someone under the influence of alcohol.

While the Globe compared Massachusetts to other States in its rate of bench trial not guilty verdicts, the Globe did not consider that other police departments around the country routinely record not only the booking but have police cruiser camera. The suggestion that video should not be used because it may not be incriminating as the State police would like is clearly an attempt to keep relevant evidence from a judge or jury and keep control of the evidence in the hands of police officers. With video in OUI cases, there would be objective evidence, precluding officers from overstating and exaggerating conclusions that a motorist is under the influence of alcohol. Instead, without video, the only method to challenge an officer’s opinion is through cross examination.