Massachusetts Restraining Order Violations
What happens when someone takes out a 209A order?
After a charge of domestic assault and battery is brought, often the victim will request a 209A restraining order. When a restraining order is served against you, it is not a criminal charge; however, a violation of the order will result in criminal charges being led. Typically, a 209A order by order you to stay away from the victim, refrain from going to their house or work.
Is a restraining order a felony or misdemeanor?
A 209A restraining order is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor as it is not a criminal charge. A 209A Restraining Order Violation in Massachusetts is considered a domestic charge by most prosecutors’ of ces and will be handled in many cases by a domestic abuse prosecutor. Although it is not a criminal offense, violation of its terms will be considered a criminal offense.
209A Restraining Order violations are handled in the district court.
What is considered a 209A violation?
A 209A violation could arise out of an allegation that you made contact with an individual protected by a 209A order, by appearing either at their home, or their work or within an unacceptable close proximity as de ned in the 209A Order.
Other types of 209A violations including a new allegation off alleged abuse of the victim of the 209A Order: This could occur in a situation where you were charged with a domestic assault and battery or assault and battery and at the time of the alleged assault and battery there was an outstanding 209A Order.
Whenever you are charged with a domestic assault and battery and there is already an existing 209A Order, the case will be taken very seriously by the district attorneys and the potential punishment will be more severe as the court interprets the violation of the 209A Order as failure to comply with and obey court orders.
What defenses can be used for a 209A Order Violation?
If you were charged with violating a 209A order, you may still have some legal defenses, including but not limited to:
- You were not served with the order;
- That the contact did not violate the terms of the order
- That it was unintentional and simply accidental contact.
- Even if there is a technical violation of the order, a technical violation will be treated by the court and
- prosecutors in terms of resolution of the case, different from a more deliberate or intentional violation of the terms of the order.
1. Call us to set up a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss a Massachusetts 209A restraining order charge or hearing. You can call Attorney Delsignore directly at 781-686-5924.
2. Recommended Reading:
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael was very professional and explained the process clearly and told us to be patient. After one year the charges got dismissed in the trial. Excellent knowledge of the court systems in the area of Boston. Would highly recommend him Ashwani
★★★★★
A careless decision on my part left me facing charges which would have severely hampered my ability to stay employed and support myself. But attorney DelSignore's skillful analysis and challenging of the evidence against me resulted in a conviction on a lesser charge. Now I'll be able to go on with my life, having learned a lesson I'll never forget. Thank you, Michael. Scott
★★★★★
Mike stuck with my case for 3.5 years and always kept me informed regarding the status. Ultimately, because of his due diligence, we ended up with an OUI not guilty verdict. This case could have gone many ways but his thorough review of the case and exceptional preparedness for trial ultimately drove a positive outcome. Thank you Mike! David
★★★★★
Michael DelSignore did an amazing job with my case! He was always available to answer any questions I had and helped walked me through the entire process. I could not have done it without them! I highly recommend choosing this law firm to deal with your legal needs, you will not be dissatisfied. Ashley
★★★★★
I cannot express the gratitude towards Michael for his amazing work and help. It was a very stressful event and they certainly put me at as much ease as possible. From start to finish it took 14 months and all the way through they were both very engaged with me. Today was worth the wait, Michael was great in court and I was rightfully found not guilty. I would recommend Michael over and over again. Claire